Wharton – U. Penn
Index: 100.0
2012 rank: 1
- To help Ivy Exec’s education partners attract top-caliber students and gain insights that will help them continue to refine their Executive MBA value propositions; Study Approach. The study was conducted in two parts. The first part identified the set of top programs to be evaluated.
- The Executive MBA program offered by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and HKUST Business School has been ranked the best joint EMBA program in the QS EMBA Rankings 2019. Released today, the QS Global EMBA Rankings 2019 reveal the top executive MBA programs around the world.
- To help Ivy Exec’s education partners attract top-caliber students and gain insights that will help them continue to refine their Executive MBA value propositions; Study Approach. The study was conducted in two parts. The first part identified the set of top programs to be evaluated.
Top 10 institutes for Executive MBAs in the world. Though India has some great institutions for management studies, the quality of programmes offered at some of the world’s best B-schools is simply on another level. Top ten colleges for executive MBA in the world are given below. Kellogg School of Management. Business leaders can earn an MBA while still working full time.
Total program cost: $171,360 in Philadelphia, $175,678 in San Francisco
Format: Alternating Friday-Saturday classes, with an initial week-long meeting and a week-long international study seminar
Length of program: 24 months
Class of 2014: 117 students in Philadelphia, 102 in San Francisco
Average age: 34-35
Average years of work experience: 10-11
Average GMAT: 700
Booth – Univ. of Chicago
Index: 97.4
2012 rank: 2
Total program cost: $154,000
Format: Alternate weekends with four week-long residencies, including London and Singapore
Length of program: 21 months
Class of 2014: 75 students
Average age: 36
Average years of work experience: 13
Northwestern Kellogg
Index: 96.1
2012 rank: 3
Total program cost: $166,500
Format: Alternating Friday-Sunday or Friday-Saturday classes in Evanston or monthly Thursday-Sunday classes in Miami
Length of program: 22 months
Class of 2014: 75 students
Average age: 37
Average years of work experience: 12
Columbia Business School
Index: 92.5
2012 rank: 4
Total program cost: $168,480
Format: Alternating Friday-Saturday classes for 22 months or Saturday only classes for 25 months
Class of 2014: 132 students (alternating Friday-Saturdays)
Average age: 33
Average years of work experience: 9
Stern – NYU
Index: 90.4
2012 rank: 5
Total program cost: $157,000
Format: Alternating Friday-Saturday classes, with two global study tours
Length of program: 22 months
Class of 2014: 60 students
Average age: 38
Average years of work experience: 14
UCLA – Anderson
Index: 88.8
2012 rank: 6
Total program cost: $129,500
Format: Alternating Friday-Saturday classes, with five residential sessions
Length of program: 22 months
Class of 2014: 75 students
Acceptance rate: 57%
Average age: 36
Average years of work experience: 13
Average undergraduate GPA: 3.33
Average GMAT: 668
Univ. of Michigan – Ross
Index: 88.6
2012 rank: 7
Total program cost: $131,000 (in-state residents), $136,000 (out-of-state)
Format: Once a month on Friday and Saturday in Ann Arbor and Los Angeles
Length of program: 21 months
Class of 2014: 39 students
Acceptance rate: 77%
Average age: 39
Average years of work experience: 15
Average undergraduate GPA: 3.20
Cornell – Johnson
Index: 82.6
2012 rank: 8
Total program cost: $157,416
Executive Mba Program Cost
Format: Alternating Saturdays and Sundays, with four one-week residencies in Ithaca
Length of program: 22 months
Class of 2014: 72 students
Average age: 35
Average years of work experience: 12
Univ. of Texas-Austin – McCombs
Index: 76.9
2012 rank: 9
Total program cost: $89,250
Format: Alternating Friday and Saturdays, starting with a week-long executive seminar
Class of 2014: 66 students
Acceptance rate: 64%
Average age: 39
Average undergraduate GPA: 3.23
USC – Marshall
Index: 72.7
2012 rank: 11
2012 tuition and fees: $114,000
Format: Classes in Los Angeles and San Diego meet bi-weekly on Fridays and Saturdays
Length of program: 21 months
Acceptance rate: 73%
Average age: 37
You May Like
Slightly more than a third of the class comes from a general management background, with the second largest group having accounting and finance backgrounds. But it’s a wildly diverse group, with managers and executives from sales and marketing, information technology, engineering, health care, operations management, and law.
None of this comes cheap: Chicago Booth’s North American tuition and fees total a breath-taking $194,000. And that’s not even the highest priced option. At Wharton, the cost of the two-year program for the class entering last year was $205,200. Not surprisingly, then, these programs are fairly lucrative for the schools that sell them, with operating margins that can exceed 35%.
EMBA Payoffs: Increased Pay & Responsibility At Work
Even in the face of more flexible and less expensive options online, Executive MBA programs continue to experience growth. “We think the EMBA market is pretty strong,” says Mark Nelson, dean of Cornell University’s Johnson Graduate School of Management. “The payoff of an EMBA is pretty clear and unchanging.”
Indeed, a recent survey found that EMBA graduates received a 14.6% increase in compensation — combined, both salary and bonuses — after program completion. No less important, survey results show that graduates leave programs having improved their critical thinking, leadership, and decision-making skills, and that those who complete the program have better insight into economic factors impacting businesses today, as well as accounting and financial acuity (see Survey: EMBA Boosts Pay By 14.6%).
While EMBA programs may offer students less flexibility than an online option, they can’t be beaten when it comes to creating a strong sense of community and bonding. “There are certainly a large number of students who still want to build out their professional and personal networks in person and want to be connected to a university,” says Joy LeBow Dellapina, executive director of Cornell’s Metro NY program.
What makes rankings of Executive MBA programs very different from lists that rate full-time MBA offerings are that they tend to give short shrift to the quality of incoming students. That’s because such metrics as GMAT scores, undergraduate grade point averages, and acceptance rates are less important in the EMBA market. Many programs don’t even require a standardized test and put more weight on work and leadership experience than an undergraduate GPA. Career outcomes, though measured generally in compensation terms, aren’t as revealing either because there are no employment stats for students who are already fully employed and compensation is largely a function of what an executive was already earning when he or she entered the program.
Top 10 Mba Universities
Different Methodologies, Different Results
As usual, each of the three major Executive MBA rankings employs vastly different methodologies. The U.S. News ranking of the top 25 U.S. programs is based entirely on a survey sent to deans and senior faculty of business schools. The Financial Times ranking is the result of two surveys: one to the schools and another to alumni of the programs. The list incorporates 16 different metrics, with the most emphasis, 40%, on salaries. A total of 4,810 alumni completed the survey last year. The Economist culls 24 different metrics from surveys to schools and alumni, placing a weight of 27.5% on pay. Roughly 8,000 alums completed the Economist surveys last year.
Not surprisingly, perhaps, all three of the latest rankings end up with completely different winners. Besides Chicago topping the U.S. list and Yale taking first prize in The Economist, MIT’s Sloan School of Management is the top-rated U.S. standalone EMBA program on the Financial Times’ list.
As with all rankings, there are some glaring anomalies that can have a dramatic impact on the results. Wharton, for example, is in second place in both the U.S. News and the U.S. EMBA players on the Financial Times list. But it is not ranked at all by The Economist because the school isn’t willing to cooperate with the magazine. Similarly, MIT Sloan is ranked by both U.S. News and the Financial Times but not The Economist, presumably for the same reason. UC-Berkeley’s highly respected EMBA program, meantime, isn’t ranked by the Financial Times, though it is ninth best on the U.S. News list and second-best among the U.S. programs on The Economist ranking.
Combining all three rankings tends to diminish an oddball result in a single ranking and at least directionally gets users to a greater truth. One example: U.S. News‘ ranks the EMBA program at Seattle University’s Albers School of Business & Economics in 11th place, just ahead of Cornell’s offering which is ranked 12th and immediately behind MIT Sloan which is ranked tenth. Few people would agree with that result. Yet, because Albers’ program isn’t ranked by either the FT or The Economist, it justifiably falls outside P&Q’s top 25, landing at a rank of 29th.
All that said, potential EMBA applicants should look over these rankings carefully. Even though the University of Maryland’s EMBA program is ranked higher on the P&Q composite list than either Georgetown or the University of Virginia’s Darden School, it’s highly unlikely that students in the Maryland program would get a better experience than those who go to Georgetown or UVA, which has an EMBA on a new campus overlooking the Potomac in the Rosslyn district of downtown Arlington, Va. But UVA chose not to cooperate with either the FT and The Economist so its rank is not a true reflection of the program’s quality. It would also be hard to justify Wharton’s rank at ten, a direct result of its failure to participate in The Economist ranking.
There are some important insights that come out of the analysis. Arizona State University’s W. P. Carey School’s EMBA offering looks like a real hidden gem. Though unranked by U.S. News, the program merits a fourth-place finish on the FT list and a fifth-place ranking on The Economist among U.S. standalone programs. The University of Michigan’s third-place finish on the P&Q list also is notable, largely because its EMBA program places highly on all three surveys, ranking sixth on each one.